Evaluation of surgical and nonsurgical interventions for clavicle fractures

Objective:The aim of this study was to review all systematic reviews and meta-analyses and provide an overview of the evidence of efficacy of interventions for clavicle fractures.

Methods:

The result of pooled data showed that while operative treatment had lower nonunion and malunion rates and higher patient satisfaction than non-operative treatment modalities [RR=6.57, 95% CI (3.01, 14.35), RR=6.93, 95% CI (2.99, 16.09); RR=0.68, 95% CI (0.51, 0.90)], these 3 outcomes were based on low-quality evidence. There was no difference between dissimilar operative and dissimilar non-operative treatments.

Conclusion:

Çalışma planı:Bulgular:Çıkarımlar:<span style="\&quot;font-family:" times="" new="" roman;="" font-size:="" medium;\"=""> Cerrahi girişim, kaynamama ve hatalı kaynama oranları ile hasta memnuniyeti açısından cerrahi dışı girişime göre daha etkili bir yaklaşımdır. Girişim yöntemlerinin etkinliğini karşılaştıran kanıt kalitesi genel olarak düşük olduğundan, bu konuda daha fazla orijinal çalışmaya ihtiyaç vardır.