Research Article

Comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic transosseous and transosseous-equivalent double-row rotator cuff repair techniques

Volume 54 · Issue 2 · January 2020 Publish Date: March 26, 2020
Full Text PDF
DOI
Ahmet Fırat
Department of Orthopedics, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Mustafa Aydın
Department of Orthopedics, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Osman Tecimel
Department of Orthopedics, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Ali Öçgüder
Department of Orthopedics, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Yavuz Sanisoğlu
Department of Biostatistics, Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Mahmut Uğurlu
Department of Orthopedics, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Fırat, A., Aydın, M., Tecimel, O., Öçgüder, A., Sanisoğlu, Y., & Uğurlu, M. (2020). Comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic transosseous and transosseous-equivalent double-row rotator cuff repair techniques. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica, 54(2), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2020.02.37
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Objective: This study compared the clinical and radiological results of the arthroscopic transosseous (ATO) and transosseous-equivalent (TOE) double-row rotator cuff repair techniques.

Methods: Prospective data collected from patients treated with ATO (32 women and 7 men, mean age: 57.03±6.39 years) and TOE (36 women and 8 men; mean age: 57.86±7.81 years) techniques were retrospectively evaluated. The visual analog scale score, Constant score, and Oxford shoulder score were used to assess the clinical results. Anchor pullout on standard anteroposterior shoulder radiographs and rotator cuff re-tear on magnetic resonance images were examined at the final follow-up to evaluate the radiological results. Rotator cuff re-tears were graded as per the classification system described by Sugaya et al.

Results: The mean follow-up duration was 33.3±11.8 months. No difference was observed in the demographic data of the two groups. Significant improvement was observed in the postoperative shoulder scores of the groups; however, no difference was observed between the groups. Re-tear was detected in 10 patients of the TOE group and 9 patients of the ATO group. Age, tear size, and retraction level could cause re-tear.

Conclusion: In the treatment of rotator cuff tears, the ATO and TOE techniques may achieve considerable improvements in shoulder functions in the short term.

Level of Evidence: Level III, Therapeutic study

Cite this article as: Fırat A, Aydın M, Tecimel O, Öçgüder A, Sanisoğlu Y, Uğurlu M. Comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic transosseous and transosseous-equivalent double-row rotator cuff repair techniques. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2020; 54(2): 178-85.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
Volume / Issue Volume 54 · Issue 2 · January 2020
Pages 178-185
History
Published Online March 26, 2020
Copyright
Affiliations
1
Ahmet Fırat
Department of Orthopedics, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
2
Mustafa Aydın
Department of Orthopedics, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
3
Osman Tecimel
Department of Orthopedics, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
4
Ali Öçgüder
Department of Orthopedics, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
5
Yavuz Sanisoğlu
Department of Biostatistics, Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
6
Mahmut Uğurlu
Department of Orthopedics, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Cite this Article
Fırat, A., Aydın, M., Tecimel, O., Öçgüder, A., Sanisoğlu, Y., & Uğurlu, M. (2020). Comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic transosseous and transosseous-equivalent double-row rotator cuff repair techniques. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica, 54(2), 178–185. https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2020.02.37
Outlines