Research Article

Patient satisfaction after innervated digital artery perforator flap for fingertip injuries

Volume 54 · Issue 3 · January 2020 Publish Date: June 4, 2020
Full Text PDF
DOI
Egemen Ayhan
Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Kadir Çevik
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Mersin University, School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey
Velat Çelik
Clinic of Hand Surgery, İskenderun State Hospital, Hatay, Turkey
Metin Manouchehr Eskandari
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Mersin University, School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey
Ayhan, E., Çevik, K., Çelik, V., & Eskandari, M. M. (2020). Patient satisfaction after innervated digital artery perforator flap for fingertip injuries. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica, 54(3), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2020.03.1
Full Text Full Text PDF

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of the innervated digital artery perforator (IDAP) flap and to analyze the relationship between patient satisfaction and outcome measures.

Methods: A total of 17 fingertips of 15 patients (14 men and one woman; mean age: 47.2 (26-62) years) were included in this retrospective study. Patients’ injured finger and defect type were recorded. At the last follow-up, the static two-point discrimination (s2PD) test, Semmes Weinstein monofilament (SWM) test, and range of motion of the affected finger were analyzed. We interviewed patients to determine hand dominance, cold intolerance, and their satisfaction with the result. We performed correlation and logistic regression analyses between patient satisfaction and outcome measures.

Results: The mean follow-up period was 13.8 (7-18) months. The mean range of motion was 77.3±3.5 (70-80) degrees for the distal interphalangeal joints of affected fingers. The mean s2PD was 6.4 (3-10) mm, and the SWM records ranged from 2.83 to 4.93 monofilament markings. Cold intolerance was noted in seven fingers (41%). Patient satisfaction was negatively correlated with cold intolerance, and cold intolerance decreased as the follow-up period extended.

Conclusion: IDAP flap satisfies both patient and surgeon, with the only significant problem being cold intolerance, regarding which patients must be informed. Although cold intolerance is hard to treat, fortunately, it generally improves with time.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic study

Cite this article as: Ayhan E, Çevik K, Çelik V, Eskandari MM. Patient satisfaction after an innervated digital artery perforator flap. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2020; 54(3): 269-75. DOI: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.03.1.

Similar Articles

Article Info
Published In
Journal Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
Volume / Issue Volume 54 · Issue 3 · January 2020
Pages 269-275
History
Published Online June 4, 2020
Copyright
Affiliations
1
Egemen Ayhan
Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
2
Kadir Çevik
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Mersin University, School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey
3
Velat Çelik
Clinic of Hand Surgery, İskenderun State Hospital, Hatay, Turkey
4
Metin Manouchehr Eskandari
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Mersin University, School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey
Cite this Article
Ayhan, E., Çevik, K., Çelik, V., & Eskandari, M. M. (2020). Patient satisfaction after innervated digital artery perforator flap for fingertip injuries. Acta Orthopaedica Et Traumatologica Turcica, 54(3), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2020.03.1
Outlines